Skip to main content

8132

Details

AADF latest year 2018
Region North East
Local authority Durham
Road name A688
Road type Major
Start junction road B6274
End junction road Copeland Rd, Bishop Auckland
Link length 8.70km (5.41 miles)
Easting & Northing 415000,522870
Latitude & longitude 54.6008,-1.76934

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2018 Manual count 9,240 7,367 1,404 341 13 74 54
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,150 5,973 1,641 364 8 89 84
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,061 5,980 1,551 353 8 91 86
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,860 5,907 1,436 339 8 91 87
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,833 5,977 1,341 333 8 95 85
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,644 5,895 1,248 326 10 92 83
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,671 6,006 1,162 321 10 91 91
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,792 6,179 1,108 314 11 99 92
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,687 6,160 1,047 301 12 91 88
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,784 6,280 1,018 298 12 103 85
2008 Manual count 7,865 6,356 999 326 11 99 85
2007 Manual count 8,030 6,530 1,005 374 8 43 78
2006 Manual count 7,505 6,016 1,032 342 3 41 74
2005 Manual count 6,787 5,578 774 321 3 16 98
2004 Manual count 7,847 6,368 976 322 5 84 97
2003 Manual count 7,633 6,310 877 292 7 67 87
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,613 5,433 739 338 2 22 81
2001 Manual count 6,476 5,368 685 326 2 22 75
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,085 5,955 716 277 7 38 99

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 8132 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 8132 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 19
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 38
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 192

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.