Skip to main content

7466

Details

AADF latest year 2018
Region North East
Local authority Northumberland
Road name A696
Road type Major
Start junction road B6342
End junction road Meadowfield, Ponteland
Link length 18.20km (11.31 miles)
Easting & Northing 405093,580965
Latitude & longitude 55.12305,-1.92169

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,406 2,612 439 206 1 111 38
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,399 2,625 419 202 1 113 40
2016 Manual count 3,379 2,628 396 198 1 117 41
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,590 2,600 538 259 0 80 114
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,503 2,560 506 247 0 83 107
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,414 2,530 465 237 0 76 106
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,357 2,522 434 232 0 73 97
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,418 2,569 449 235 0 79 86
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,412 2,587 428 233 0 78 86
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,497 2,686 417 232 0 87 75
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,448 2,670 387 237 0 82 72
2007 Manual count 3,478 2,716 370 241 0 82 69
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,145 3,158 514 348 0 82 43
2005 Manual count 4,075 3,127 485 340 0 77 46
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,413 2,726 376 238 0 45 28
2003 Manual count 3,385 2,680 383 246 0 42 34
2002 Manual count 3,500 2,731 367 326 0 34 42
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,064 2,408 315 287 0 4 50
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,017 2,352 315 299 0 4 47

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 7466 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 7466 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 19
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 38
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.