Skip to main content

57543

Details

AADF latest year 2019
Region North East
Local authority Durham
Road name A1086
Road type Major
Start junction road LA Boundary
End junction road Road to Eastfield, Peterlee
Link length 5.10km (3.17 miles)
Easting & Northing 445200,540000
Latitude & longitude 54.75293,-1.29926

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,131 8,697 1,133 104 33 69 128
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,036 8,589 1,143 105 30 73 126
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,123 8,685 1,122 103 27 74 139
2016 Manual count 10,140 8,749 1,066 103 28 73 149
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,207 8,601 1,227 138 21 91 150
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,228 8,704 1,147 135 21 95 146
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,020 8,584 1,067 134 26 92 143
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,121 8,746 994 135 26 91 156
2011 Manual count 10,337 8,998 947 135 28 99 158
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,700 8,276 1,009 110 19 113 192
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,840 8,436 981 109 19 128 186
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,927 8,538 963 117 16 123 186
2007 Manual count 10,243 8,865 963 123 16 124 168
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,240 9,819 975 156 24 115 175
2005 Manual count 10,958 9,552 929 154 25 137 186
2004 Manual count 10,272 8,816 995 147 21 108 206
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,332 9,690 1,073 162 15 194 213
2002 Manual count 11,082 9,604 952 163 18 158 205
2001 Manual count 10,562 9,210 895 135 23 119 203
2000 Manual count 10,160 8,760 928 156 5 34 282

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 57543 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 57543 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 20
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 40
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 192

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.