Skip to main content

56921

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region North East
Local authority Middlesbrough
Road name A1032
Road type Major
Start junction road A174(T)
End junction road A1130
Link length 2.30km (1.43 miles)
Easting & Northing 448760,516000
Latitude & longitude 54.53694,-1.24795

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,775 15,176 2,039 114 75 53 393
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,401 14,943 1,867 112 81 54 424
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,004 14,653 1,780 116 87 61 394
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,516 14,266 1,665 112 90 64 409
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,554 14,393 1,602 110 91 57 391
2011 Manual count 16,733 14,621 1,583 109 96 60 360
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,957 17,714 1,752 75 85 99 317
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,916 17,821 1,640 71 85 104 280
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,506 17,437 1,616 77 85 93 283
2007 Manual count 19,909 17,829 1,582 75 75 97 326
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 20,001 17,785 1,611 111 189 158 336
2005 Manual count 19,920 17,731 1,586 109 120 152 342
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,767 17,774 1,561 108 144 77 247
2003 Manual count 19,773 17,739 1,576 106 178 87 265
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 20,066 18,118 1,358 104 164 142 344
2001 Manual count 20,093 18,154 1,356 107 158 140 336
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,848 19,692 1,386 233 134 119 418

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 56921 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 56921 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.