Skip to main content

36086

Details

AADF latest year 2019
Region East Midlands
Local authority Nottinghamshire
Road name A1
Road type Major
Start junction road A1 spur
End junction road B6325
Link length 3.60km (2.24 miles)
Easting & Northing 480000,357120
Latitude & longitude 53.10531,-0.80649

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2019 Manual count 48,342 32,206 7,622 8,228 0 186 99
2018 Manual count 45,194 28,494 7,727 8,724 0 145 104
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 53,239 37,039 8,106 7,780 0 165 149
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 52,523 37,055 7,609 7,550 0 164 146
2015 Manual count 50,666 35,978 7,045 7,342 0 157 143
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 38,842 25,286 5,279 8,119 0 94 64
2013 Manual count 37,713 24,717 4,918 7,930 0 91 57
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 43,445 30,461 5,748 6,841 0 207 188
2011 Manual count 43,221 30,682 5,520 6,621 0 213 185
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 31,568 20,367 4,975 5,997 0 90 139
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 31,884 20,867 4,849 5,936 0 101 131
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 32,475 21,142 4,694 6,417 0 97 125
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 32,656 21,292 4,685 6,456 0 100 123
2006 Manual count 32,385 21,441 4,228 6,487 0 99 130
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 32,205 20,205 4,222 7,662 0 52 64
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 32,333 20,347 4,036 7,829 0 54 67
2003 Manual count 31,523 20,007 3,626 7,757 0 53 80
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 32,781 21,651 3,588 7,427 0 26 89
2001 Manual count 32,132 21,041 3,560 7,419 0 26 86
2000 Manual count 28,350 18,393 2,960 6,817 0 118 62

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 36086 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 36086 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 20
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 40
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 216

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.