Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

8537

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Leeds
Road name A62
Road type Major
Start junction road M62 mid-junction
End junction road A650 roundabout
Link length 0.30km (0.19 miles)
Easting & Northing 424101,428086
Latitude & longitude 53.74861,-1.63602

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,895 24,971 6,267 2,377 26 131 149
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,019 24,587 5,737 2,400 28 134 161
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,200 25,047 5,454 2,405 30 131 163
2013 Manual count 32,642 25,309 4,790 2,266 31 124 153
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 28,848 22,124 4,750 1,713 38 184 77
2011 Manual count 29,292 22,218 4,946 1,852 40 204 72
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 30,409 23,861 4,689 1,604 56 148 107
2009 Manual count 31,017 24,373 4,665 1,716 56 161 102
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 37,850 28,152 6,611 2,706 37 246 135
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 38,255 28,698 6,314 2,845 33 264 134
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,206 30,114 5,788 2,905 53 260 139
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,045 30,024 5,697 2,932 34 251 141
2004 Manual count 39,847 30,793 5,552 3,110 40 249 143
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 43,178 34,949 4,226 3,716 26 180 107
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 43,138 35,446 3,877 3,534 29 161 120
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 43,301 35,517 3,870 3,637 27 159 118
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 42,696 34,820 3,886 3,720 29 154 116

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 8537 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 8537 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 96

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.