Skip to main content

7980

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region North West
Local authority Lancashire
Road name M65
Road type Major
Start junction road 12
End junction road 13
Link length 1.80km (1.12 miles)
Easting & Northing 385261,437815
Latitude & longitude 53.83639,-2.22545

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 58,343 46,174 9,904 2,069 0 74 121
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 56,802 45,464 9,067 2,063 0 76 131
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 55,675 45,344 8,149 1,963 0 78 141
2013 Manual count 54,534 44,954 7,424 1,944 0 79 133
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 47,985 40,265 4,966 2,398 0 119 237
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 48,679 41,022 4,844 2,458 0 130 225
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 47,827 40,337 4,636 2,523 0 133 198
2009 Manual count 48,519 41,076 4,591 2,535 0 142 175
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 54,115 44,633 6,335 2,700 0 135 312
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 55,009 45,683 6,186 2,772 0 128 240
2006 Manual count 54,353 45,365 5,842 2,809 0 124 213
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 46,866 38,546 5,045 3,014 0 132 129
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 46,706 38,546 4,875 3,031 0 130 124
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 45,117 37,496 4,423 2,844 0 147 207
2002 Manual count 45,994 38,418 4,295 2,950 0 130 201
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 41,936 34,184 4,580 2,960 0 115 97
2000 Manual count 40,651 33,188 4,333 2,921 0 114 95

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 7980 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 7980 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.