Skip to main content

77621

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority East Riding of Yorkshire
Road name A161
Road type Major
Start junction road Wroots Avenue
End junction road A614 RawcliffeRd
Link length 2.70km (1.68 miles)
Easting & Northing 474430,423000
Latitude & longitude 53.69816,-0.87416

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,577 6,439 1,411 411 246 166 151
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,376 6,340 1,291 412 265 170 163
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,216 6,216 1,231 425 285 193 151
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,000 6,052 1,152 438 293 201 157
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,984 6,106 1,108 439 297 181 150
2011 Manual count 8,085 6,203 1,095 460 314 189 138
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,861 5,148 1,307 288 205 32 86
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,797 5,180 1,224 283 203 34 76
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,686 5,068 1,206 306 203 30 76
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,793 5,182 1,181 311 182 31 88
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,852 5,266 1,121 336 291 33 96
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,973 5,368 1,105 359 186 37 104
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,180 5,626 1,037 362 219 45 110
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,017 5,554 942 317 270 70 134
2002 Manual count 7,145 5,768 867 323 303 49 138
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,010 5,678 808 341 291 47 136
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,210 5,860 802 373 304 45 130

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 77621 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 77621 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 48

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.