Skip to main content

7750

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Rotherham
Road name A630
Road type Major
Start junction road A629
End junction road A633
Link length 0.90km (0.56 miles)
Easting & Northing 442600,393140
Latitude & longitude 53.43335,-1.36027

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 28,544 23,863 3,150 1,054 53 140 337
2016 Manual count 28,577 24,040 2,992 1,045 56 139 361
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 27,827 22,428 4,144 930 17 234 90
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 28,047 22,847 3,940 939 18 230 91
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 27,721 23,087 3,460 873 19 217 86
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 27,813 23,218 3,421 866 19 217 91
2011 Manual count 28,143 23,317 3,562 939 20 240 85
2010 Manual count 27,766 23,444 2,823 984 39 164 351
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,158 27,234 4,189 1,300 8 170 265
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,342 27,677 3,868 1,346 8 180 271
2007 Manual count 33,773 28,212 3,695 1,405 7 193 268
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,153 27,379 3,865 1,376 19 172 361
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 32,992 27,298 3,803 1,360 12 165 366
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,665 27,997 3,707 1,426 15 163 372
2003 Manual count 33,697 27,942 3,741 1,428 17 186 400
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 31,742 26,047 3,421 1,541 19 206 527
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 31,795 26,099 3,414 1,562 19 204 516
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 31,297 25,588 3,428 1,577 19 197 507

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 7750 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 7750 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.