Skip to main content

77179

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region East of England
Local authority Norfolk
Road name A1067
Road type Major
Start junction road Beech Avenue
End junction road Marl Hill Rd
Link length 4.00km (2.49 miles)
Easting & Northing 614396,315502
Latitude & longitude 52.69476,1.17127

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,469 7,939 1,792 605 9 69 64
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,370 7,949 1,693 591 9 71 66
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,130 7,851 1,568 573 9 71 67
2014 Manual count 10,006 7,906 1,440 522 9 71 66
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,025 6,529 1,904 459 10 66 67
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,973 6,544 1,840 457 10 64 68
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,965 6,596 1,779 455 11 69 66
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,960 6,636 1,732 464 13 64 64
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,009 6,730 1,680 466 13 71 62
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,064 6,751 1,684 498 11 71 60
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,223 6,974 1,623 501 11 68 57
2006 Manual count 8,935 6,919 1,432 467 11 65 52
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,754 7,000 1,210 418 7 83 43
2004 Manual count 8,690 6,958 1,169 428 7 94 41
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,234 7,356 1,230 522 1 78 48
2002 Manual count 9,007 7,262 1,096 523 1 72 54
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,789 7,112 1,046 515 1 70 46
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,496 6,818 1,034 534 1 68 42

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 77179 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 77179 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 96

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.