Skip to main content

76080

Details

AADF latest year 2015
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority York
Road name A1176
Road type Major
Start junction road A59 Boroughbridge Road
End junction road A19 Clifton Road
Link length 1.50km (0.93 miles)
Easting & Northing 458850,452750
Latitude & longitude 53.9675,-1.10442

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,197 14,328 2,227 70 820 303 268
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,943 14,248 2,109 74 883 285 227
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,527 13,982 1,985 84 909 296 181
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,649 13,980 2,142 86 921 281 161
2011 Manual count 16,600 14,190 1,901 85 974 279 145
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,294 17,994 2,108 280 476 594 318
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,408 18,120 2,062 272 474 656 298
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,048 17,852 1,958 284 474 672 282
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 20,676 17,606 1,850 274 422 646 300
2006 Manual count 21,330 18,320 1,814 270 677 630 296
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,957 18,296 2,376 205 558 966 114
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,149 18,096 2,009 179 659 746 119
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 20,291 17,621 1,736 168 813 628 138
2002 Manual count 19,392 16,894 1,644 164 911 491 199
2001 Manual count 21,570 18,973 1,838 297 1,144 254 208
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,633 20,098 1,784 289 1,194 264 198

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 76080 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 76080 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 16
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 32
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 96

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.