Skip to main content

76009

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region London
Local authority Enfield
Road name A105
Road type Major
Start junction road A110
End junction road Myddleton Ave
Link length 1.80km (1.12 miles)
Easting & Northing 532920,197350
Latitude & longitude 51.65923,-0.07972

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,123 10,808 959 160 50 41 154
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,314 11,036 930 163 48 39 145
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,324 11,073 894 164 42 41 152
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,282 11,041 865 179 37 39 158
2012 Manual count 12,177 10,946 843 175 46 40 171
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,530 13,584 1,195 253 169 87 411
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,562 13,625 1,201 251 170 87 398
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,927 14,003 1,214 244 176 92 374
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,072 14,116 1,247 258 163 97 354
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,432 14,448 1,274 264 140 99 347
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,601 14,668 1,247 237 109 102 347
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,328 14,404 1,258 241 87 94 331
2004 Manual count 16,461 14,564 1,232 254 85 102 309
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,541 15,094 1,649 224 279 297 277
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,670 15,402 1,497 244 192 287 240
2001 Manual count 17,650 15,402 1,468 260 185 300 220
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,607 15,386 1,464 274 168 277 206

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 76009 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 76009 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 72

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.