Skip to main content

75373

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Barnsley
Road name A629
Road type Major
Start junction road A629 main route
End junction road A616
Link length 0.20km (0.12 miles)
Easting & Northing 430950,398780
Latitude & longitude 53.48485,-1.53506

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 3,596 2,816 572 179 1 11 20
2015 Manual count 3,515 2,781 529 174 1 11 20
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,996 3,567 1,147 222 4 37 23
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,860 3,517 1,067 217 5 36 23
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,853 3,584 994 215 5 36 25
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,910 3,687 947 212 5 39 25
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,838 3,676 895 207 5 36 24
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,887 3,747 870 206 5 41 23
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,935 3,792 853 228 5 39 23
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 5,088 3,938 853 237 5 39 21
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 5,095 4,042 774 221 5 39 19
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,954 3,932 737 219 6 46 20
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,934 3,936 702 227 5 49 20
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,926 3,932 696 226 6 48 24
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,810 3,897 618 233 7 39 23
2001 Manual count 4,715 3,850 573 231 7 39 22
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 4,690 3,838 554 241 8 35 22

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 75373 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 75373 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 48

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.