Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

73988

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region South East
Local authority Windsor and Maidenhead
Road name A30
Road type Major
Start junction road LA Boundary
End junction road LA Boundary
Link length 0.50km (0.31 miles)
Easting & Northing 502070,172185
Latitude & longitude 51.43947,-0.53284

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 47,909 40,164 5,624 1,560 30 485 76
2015 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 45,433 38,183 5,264 1,346 21 536 104
2014 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 43,757 36,891 5,150 1,239 12 395 83
2013 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 45,479 37,909 5,517 1,338 9 542 173
2012 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 41,985 35,203 4,872 1,140 18 702 69
2011 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 45,384 38,668 4,723 1,348 46 508 137
2010 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 43,240 36,263 4,898 1,375 9 617 87
2009 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 45,170 37,757 5,139 1,379 19 816 79
2008 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 44,352 37,212 4,946 1,606 13 450 138
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 46,938 38,553 5,345 2,028 23 865 147
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 46,637 38,825 4,824 1,973 23 859 156
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 45,657 38,176 4,604 1,924 24 792 161
2004 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 45,759 38,444 4,401 1,920 23 826 168
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 50,710 43,624 4,596 1,595 22 741 154
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 49,205 42,685 4,152 1,529 26 683 156
2001 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 47,911 41,482 4,119 1,490 24 669 151
2000 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 47,158 40,384 4,168 1,671 37 760 175

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 73988 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 73988 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 0

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.