Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

6007

Details

AADF latest year 2024
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Rotherham
Road name M1
Road type Major
Start junction road M18 spur
End junction road 33
Link length 3.80km (2.36 miles)
Easting & Northing 445042,389324
Latitude & longitude 53.39885,-1.32406

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2024 Manual count 119,681 81,887 23,006 14,351 0 193 243
2023 Manual count 146,242 100,413 28,782 16,607 0 226 215
2022 Manual count 125,496 86,010 25,183 13,804 0 205 294
2021 Manual count 116,736 76,349 25,747 14,313 0 198 129
2020 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 93,983 61,489 18,686 13,432 0 180 196
2019 Manual count 133,126 95,175 22,514 14,749 0 324 363
2018 Automatic counter 121,974 87,372 21,067 13,109 0 174 251
2017 Manual count 126,755 91,656 21,231 13,426 0 182 260
2016 Manual count 120,024 87,627 19,375 12,481 0 289 252
2015 Manual count 121,114 90,056 17,811 12,779 0 199 269
2014 Manual count 116,368 83,595 18,832 13,446 0 210 284
2013 Manual count 113,181 83,016 17,489 12,146 0 235 295
2012 Manual count 106,570 77,450 14,962 13,531 0 308 319
2011 Manual count 117,501 87,882 16,677 12,406 0 241 295
2010 Manual count 114,472 84,758 13,222 15,813 0 313 366
2009 Manual count 122,252 94,095 14,016 13,476 0 323 342
2008 Manual count 119,275 90,784 12,735 15,135 0 352 269
2007 Manual count 119,888 86,626 17,869 14,609 0 364 420
2006 Manual count 120,726 88,404 16,499 14,823 0 429 571
2005 Manual count 117,498 84,774 15,535 16,379 0 397 413
2004 Manual count 117,773 87,734 13,626 15,747 0 208 458
2003 Manual count 115,845 86,156 13,354 15,729 0 248 358
2002 Manual count 109,754 80,550 12,034 16,437 0 292 441
2001 Manual count 111,294 82,242 13,064 15,323 0 268 397
2000 Manual count 111,146 81,418 13,950 15,170 0 168 440

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 6007 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 6007 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 25
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 50
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 552

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.