Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

60032

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Rotherham
Road name A6021
Road type Major
Start junction road A6021 split
End junction road A633 / A630
Link length 1.40km (0.87 miles)
Easting & Northing 443210,393000
Latitude & longitude 53.43204,-1.35111

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,387 6,990 746 85 12 16 551
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,441 7,042 709 85 13 16 590
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,318 6,933 649 84 13 16 637
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,113 6,799 619 87 14 18 591
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,915 6,619 578 84 15 19 614
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,921 6,678 557 82 15 17 587
2011 Manual count 7,972 6,784 550 80 16 18 540
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,928 5,142 1,005 130 21 18 633
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,819 5,173 941 127 21 19 559
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,706 5,061 927 136 21 17 565
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,884 5,175 907 134 19 17 651
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,997 5,259 861 144 30 18 715
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,150 5,361 849 149 20 20 771
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,395 5,619 796 139 23 25 816
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,417 5,547 723 112 29 39 996
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,592 5,760 666 115 32 27 1,024
2001 Manual count 7,452 5,669 621 120 30 26 1,016
2000 Manual count 7,967 6,018 542 176 13 68 1,163

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 60032 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 60032 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 72

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.