Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

58451

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority East Riding of Yorkshire
Road name A1079
Road type Major
Start junction road A1035
End junction road A164
Link length 3.80km (2.36 miles)
Easting & Northing 502280,437040
Latitude & longitude 53.8196,-0.44784

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,386 15,445 2,499 1,123 6 245 74
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,989 15,256 2,314 1,099 6 245 75
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,846 15,363 2,125 1,039 6 244 74
2013 Manual count 18,796 15,402 2,041 1,059 8 223 71
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,487 14,171 1,992 1,025 2 159 138
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,563 14,285 1,926 1,046 2 172 134
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,625 14,371 1,876 1,090 2 158 130
2009 Manual count 17,793 14,575 1,820 1,097 2 175 126
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,876 13,887 2,268 1,264 0 289 168
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,255 14,346 2,185 1,291 0 275 158
2006 Manual count 17,808 14,233 1,929 1,235 0 266 145
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,917 15,223 2,251 1,243 3 126 74
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,809 15,132 2,175 1,285 3 144 73
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,642 15,117 2,061 1,251 3 128 85
2002 Manual count 18,221 14,923 1,837 1,248 3 118 95
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 17,503 14,486 1,251 1,453 8 199 114
2000 Manual count 16,894 13,889 1,237 1,470 8 193 105

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 58451 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 58451 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.