Skip to main content

48753

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region East of England
Local authority Bedford
Road name A6
Road type Major
Start junction road Horne Lane
End junction road High St
Link length 0.20km (0.12 miles)
Easting & Northing 505000,249650
Latitude & longitude 52.1352,-0.46728

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,389 11,279 1,357 202 107 89 462
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,137 11,106 1,242 199 115 91 499
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,845 10,890 1,185 205 124 103 463
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,500 10,602 1,108 201 127 107 481
2012 Manual count 12,519 10,697 1,066 199 129 96 460
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,526 10,593 2,100 330 106 78 425
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,369 10,625 1,882 320 96 92 450
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,253 10,689 1,762 308 95 97 397
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,018 10,459 1,736 335 95 87 401
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,281 10,694 1,700 335 84 91 461
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,445 10,868 1,615 360 135 95 507
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 13,703 11,078 1,591 379 86 109 546
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,179 11,613 1,492 362 102 133 579
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,029 11,464 1,355 302 126 202 706
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,330 11,904 1,248 310 141 142 726
2001 Manual count 14,064 11,717 1,164 326 136 137 720
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,632 10,219 1,285 431 176 143 554

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 48753 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 48753 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 17
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 24

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.