Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

48364

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region South East
Local authority Kent
Road name A260
Road type Major
Start junction road Wear Bay Road
End junction road B 2011
Link length 0.40km (0.25 miles)
Easting & Northing 623330,137434
Latitude & longitude 51.09271,1.18798

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,934 8,774 1,748 197 5 80 135
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,662 8,639 1,600 195 6 82 146
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,429 8,471 1,526 203 6 93 136
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,113 8,248 1,427 200 7 97 141
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,113 8,321 1,373 197 7 87 135
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,221 8,453 1,357 196 7 91 124
2010 Manual count 10,122 8,478 1,216 190 7 107 131
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,478 7,262 1,859 185 8 48 124
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,306 7,105 1,831 201 8 43 126
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,455 7,265 1,794 206 8 45 145
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,516 7,383 1,704 223 13 46 160
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,674 7,527 1,679 241 8 54 173
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,955 7,889 1,574 244 9 65 183
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,756 7,788 1,430 215 12 100 223
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,928 8,087 1,317 225 13 70 229
2001 Manual count 9,723 7,960 1,228 241 13 67 227
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,479 7,777 1,036 361 7 85 220

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 48364 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 48364 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 48

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.