Skip to main content

47825

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority North Yorkshire
Road name A6108
Road type Major
Start junction road A6136
End junction road A1(T)
Link length 6.90km (4.29 miles)
Easting & Northing 420003,502573
Latitude & longitude 54.41822,-1.69327

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,869 6,115 1,352 154 5 58 189
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,805 6,123 1,278 150 5 60 194
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,633 6,048 1,183 145 5 60 197
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,322 5,857 1,082 138 5 61 183
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,177 5,783 1,027 138 6 54 174
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,124 5,784 987 138 7 52 162
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,077 5,786 943 139 7 56 153
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,970 5,740 869 140 8 53 168
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,084 5,881 849 138 8 57 159
2008 Manual count 6,937 5,760 845 146 7 54 132
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,820 5,623 845 185 9 61 106
2006 Manual count 6,765 5,657 765 185 9 56 102
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,044 5,807 856 158 14 82 141
2004 Manual count 7,006 5,783 854 160 12 74 135
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,792 5,689 705 135 7 70 193
2002 Manual count 6,490 5,507 675 141 8 67 100
2001 Manual count 6,522 5,521 675 214 16 55 57
2000 Manual count 8,096 7,039 700 207 9 49 101

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 47825 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 47825 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 144

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.