Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

47804

Details

AADF latest year 2018
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Calderdale
Road name A6025
Road type Major
Start junction road A629
End junction road A644
Link length 4.70km (2.92 miles)
Easting & Northing 412000,422470
Latitude & longitude 53.69855,-1.81973

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,881 8,861 1,565 299 19 108 48
2017 Manual count 10,852 8,904 1,494 293 20 110 50
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,751 9,552 2,507 543 46 86 62
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,388 9,406 2,295 532 49 88 67
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,125 9,223 2,189 551 53 100 62
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,730 8,979 2,047 535 54 104 65
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,706 9,059 1,969 522 55 94 62
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,819 9,203 1,946 515 58 98 57
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,649 9,231 1,744 498 52 116 60
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,578 9,287 1,633 483 52 122 53
2008 Manual count 11,381 9,087 1,609 522 52 110 53
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,076 7,303 1,207 445 21 86 35
2006 Manual count 9,167 7,421 1,145 474 34 89 38
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,485 8,427 1,406 513 28 93 46
2004 Manual count 10,805 8,833 1,319 490 32 113 50
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,208 8,089 1,414 477 38 180 48
2002 Manual count 10,364 8,400 1,302 486 43 126 50
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,329 8,387 1,299 498 45 93 52
2000 Manual count 10,603 8,655 1,290 520 47 88 50

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 47804 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 47804 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 19
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 38
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 144

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.