Skip to main content

46735

Details

AADF latest year 2018
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority East Riding of Yorkshire
Road name A614
Road type Major
Start junction road B1246 / B1248
End junction road A164 split
Link length 6.20km (3.85 miles)
Easting & Northing 500000,455950
Latitude & longitude 53.98995,-0.47629

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2018 Manual count 9,627 7,240 1,535 722 14 76 55
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,738 6,070 1,772 716 7 81 100
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,634 6,078 1,674 697 7 83 102
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,417 6,003 1,550 677 7 83 104
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,298 6,045 1,424 643 7 83 102
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,248 6,061 1,368 645 9 76 98
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,211 6,074 1,322 641 9 73 100
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,220 6,123 1,278 643 10 79 97
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,228 6,160 1,244 657 12 73 94
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,296 6,247 1,206 671 12 81 91
2008 Manual count 8,366 6,266 1,208 722 10 81 89
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,571 7,120 1,589 674 4 108 80
2006 Manual count 9,486 7,189 1,388 692 4 127 90
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,106 7,930 1,011 864 3 165 136
2004 Manual count 10,069 7,899 1,008 882 3 150 130
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,212 8,161 1,101 753 0 52 145
2002 Manual count 9,873 7,900 1,054 794 0 50 75
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,162 5,388 898 699 13 113 64
2000 Manual count 7,122 5,382 865 707 15 104 64

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 46735 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 46735 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 19
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 38
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 144

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.