Skip to main content

46633

Details

AADF latest year 2019
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Leeds
Road name A64
Road type Major
Start junction road A63
End junction road A6120
Link length 2.80km (1.74 miles)
Easting & Northing 435000,434700
Latitude & longitude 53.80744,-1.47

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 30,416 25,822 3,546 478 193 177 393
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 30,135 25,502 3,577 478 176 189 389
2017 Manual count 30,393 25,786 3,512 475 159 191 429
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 34,236 27,931 5,015 501 137 218 570
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,427 27,502 4,591 496 147 223 616
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,719 28,016 4,365 498 158 219 621
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 33,395 28,309 3,834 462 163 206 585
2012 Manual count 33,548 28,471 3,790 460 165 206 622
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 34,456 28,726 4,286 577 118 329 538
2010 Manual count 34,449 28,870 4,157 574 107 310 538
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 37,940 31,185 5,138 754 173 184 679
2008 Manual count 38,100 31,692 4,744 775 173 195 694
2007 Manual count 36,178 30,008 4,466 760 159 277 667
2006 Manual count 35,175 29,343 4,217 709 98 237 669
2005 Manual count 35,722 29,712 4,340 677 95 274 719
2004 Manual count 37,628 31,976 3,821 730 71 268 833
2003 Manual count 36,676 31,513 3,472 909 96 267 515
2002 Manual count 34,844 29,513 3,747 798 46 201 585
2001 Manual count 33,679 28,582 3,353 773 87 177 794
2000 Manual count 36,301 30,858 3,662 754 134 480 547

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 46633 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 46633 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 20
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 40
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 288

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.