Skip to main content

46616

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Wakefield
Road name A61
Road type Major
Start junction road A642
End junction road A650
Link length 1.00km (0.62 miles)
Easting & Northing 433000,421400
Latitude & longitude 53.68803,-1.50178

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Manual count 17,282 14,705 1,905 313 88 75 283
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,565 16,245 2,484 433 95 149 254
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,123 15,995 2,274 427 102 152 275
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,721 15,684 2,169 441 109 172 255
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 18,177 15,270 2,028 434 113 180 265
2012 Manual count 18,201 15,406 1,951 429 114 161 253
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,695 18,140 2,623 460 77 214 258
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,690 18,232 2,544 454 69 202 258
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,096 18,623 2,531 476 69 220 246
2008 Manual count 22,241 18,926 2,337 493 69 233 252
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,946 20,687 3,057 653 54 279 270
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 25,730 21,707 2,801 666 87 276 280
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 25,616 21,643 2,757 664 56 266 286
2004 Manual count 26,134 22,198 2,688 695 66 263 290
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,231 20,254 2,838 633 70 316 190
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,236 20,542 2,604 595 79 282 213
2001 Manual count 24,278 20,583 2,598 609 76 279 209
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 25,478 21,668 2,104 1,111 104 222 373

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 46616 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 46616 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.