Skip to main content

38097

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Rotherham
Road name A57
Road type Major
Start junction road A618
End junction road M1
Link length 1.60km (0.99 miles)
Easting & Northing 447000,384700
Latitude & longitude 53.35712,-1.2953

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,427 18,512 4,206 1,487 12 146 75
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,190 18,535 3,974 1,454 12 151 77
2015 Manual count 23,649 18,307 3,680 1,433 12 150 78
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,834 16,938 4,069 1,565 4 153 108
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,175 16,556 3,791 1,582 6 149 96
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,097 16,757 3,571 1,535 6 141 93
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,066 16,878 3,429 1,522 6 145 92
2010 Manual count 22,103 16,980 3,351 1,534 7 147 91
2009 Manual count 22,674 17,918 3,121 1,454 12 85 96
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 23,326 17,260 4,128 1,713 1 127 98
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 23,447 17,382 4,120 1,718 1 130 97
2006 Manual count 23,153 17,505 3,718 1,697 1 130 103
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,748 16,057 3,830 1,588 16 182 91
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 21,701 16,170 3,662 1,585 15 189 95
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 20,988 15,900 3,290 1,497 15 187 114
2002 Manual count 20,262 15,558 2,972 1,444 18 172 116
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 20,503 16,021 2,868 1,421 12 105 88
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 19,853 15,539 2,716 1,417 14 95 86

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 38097 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 38097 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.