Skip to main content

36046

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region North West
Local authority Manchester
Road name M56
Road type Major
Start junction road Thornley Lane Bridge
End junction road Outwood Lane roundabout
Link length 0.60km (0.37 miles)
Easting & Northing 381450,385970
Latitude & longitude 53.37028,-2.28026

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 56,188 51,196 4,056 508 0 99 329
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 55,071 50,409 3,713 492 0 101 355
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 54,571 50,275 3,337 472 0 104 384
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 53,817 49,843 3,040 467 0 105 363
2012 Manual count 53,050 49,351 2,816 442 0 96 345
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 58,986 55,526 2,276 439 0 86 659
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 57,895 54,598 2,178 452 0 88 579
2009 Manual count 58,810 55,599 2,157 448 0 94 512
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 57,573 53,718 2,338 409 0 182 926
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 58,570 54,982 2,284 418 0 172 714
2006 Manual count 57,982 54,600 2,156 426 0 168 632
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 54,763 50,768 2,632 411 0 124 828
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 54,645 50,768 2,543 414 0 122 798
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 53,545 49,384 2,307 385 0 138 1,331
2002 Manual count 54,655 50,599 2,240 400 0 122 1,294
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 53,333 49,453 2,094 583 0 148 1,055
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 51,742 48,013 1,981 570 0 146 1,032

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 36046 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 36046 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 96

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.