Skip to main content

28867

Details

AADF latest year 2019
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority North Yorkshire
Road name A661
Road type Major
Start junction road Forest Lane
End junction road A59/A6040
Link length 2.50km (1.55 miles)
Easting & Northing 433029,454557
Latitude & longitude 53.98603,-1.4978

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,501 19,038 2,434 778 65 96 156
2018 Manual count 22,289 18,802 2,455 776 59 102 154
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,981 20,972 2,856 903 35 96 154
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,992 21,127 2,713 892 36 95 165
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,450 20,803 2,484 888 39 97 178
2014 Manual count 24,155 20,686 2,352 875 42 91 151
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,954 19,273 2,381 878 62 159 263
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 23,087 19,269 2,570 863 62 151 234
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 23,053 19,559 2,281 852 66 150 211
2010 Manual count 22,434 19,251 2,018 820 60 151 194
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 25,293 21,800 2,504 695 49 106 188
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 24,868 21,478 2,378 726 49 109 177
2007 Manual count 24,458 21,181 2,248 736 45 105 188
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,240 18,898 2,135 1,004 63 51 152
2005 Manual count 21,019 18,102 1,792 890 41 83 152
2004 Manual count 20,882 19,301 831 577 34 57 116
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,271 20,717 747 585 45 156 66
2002 Manual count 21,351 19,863 708 562 50 122 96
2001 Manual count 17,835 16,025 920 710 45 65 115
2000 Manual count 18,385 16,674 674 751 34 149 137

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 28867 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 28867 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 20
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 40
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 216

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.