Skip to main content

28567

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Leeds
Road name A62
Road type Major
Start junction road LA Boundary
End junction road M62
Link length 0.10km (0.06 miles)
Easting & Northing 423909,427890
Latitude & longitude 53.74686,-1.63894

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Manual count 43,314 33,885 6,435 2,790 46 118 87
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,353 30,649 5,668 2,675 65 232 130
2014 Manual count 39,650 31,222 5,388 2,681 70 228 131
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,231 30,798 5,726 2,427 20 181 100
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,373 30,973 5,661 2,452 20 180 106
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,940 31,105 5,895 2,641 21 200 99
2010 Manual count 39,886 31,261 5,718 2,619 19 189 99
2009 Manual count 37,089 28,947 5,494 2,339 20 177 132
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 38,288 28,874 6,010 3,078 35 183 143
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 38,727 29,433 5,741 3,216 32 196 141
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,754 30,884 5,261 3,268 51 194 147
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 39,573 30,792 5,179 3,266 33 187 149
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 40,403 31,582 5,048 3,437 39 184 152
2003 Manual count 40,458 31,518 5,094 3,472 48 210 164
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 29,461 20,926 5,329 2,936 29 139 131
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 29,548 20,968 5,318 2,996 27 137 129
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 29,203 20,557 5,339 3,048 29 132 127

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 28567 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 28567 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 120

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.