Skip to main content

28422

Details

AADF latest year 2016
Region East of England
Local authority Bedford
Road name A6
Road type Major
Start junction road Harpur St
End junction road Union St
Link length 0.50km (0.31 miles)
Easting & Northing 504728,250270
Latitude & longitude 52.14082,-0.47107

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,315 10,135 1,637 383 123 58 102
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 12,028 9,979 1,499 381 132 59 110
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,778 9,785 1,429 394 142 67 102
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,433 9,527 1,337 394 147 70 106
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,455 9,612 1,286 393 148 63 101
2011 Manual count 11,595 9,764 1,271 401 157 66 93
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,990 8,841 1,712 341 146 46 50
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,929 8,894 1,603 340 146 48 44
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,733 8,703 1,580 363 146 43 44
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,902 8,898 1,547 360 130 45 52
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,001 9,043 1,469 386 209 47 56
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,188 9,218 1,447 408 134 54 61
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 11,546 9,662 1,358 396 157 65 65
2003 Manual count 11,287 9,539 1,233 336 194 100 79
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,538 14,127 1,313 560 144 143 395
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,242 13,905 1,225 583 138 138 391
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 16,690 14,350 1,216 619 144 132 373

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 28422 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 28422 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 17
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 34
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 48

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.