Skip to main content

27433

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Wakefield
Road name A650
Road type Major
Start junction road Immediately S of Snow Hill View
End junction road Junction with Bradford Street
Link length 1.70km (1.06 miles)
Easting & Northing 432772,421477
Latitude & longitude 53.68874,-1.50523

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Manual count 16,094 14,361 1,386 175 93 105 67
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,654 5,522 913 70 31 45 104
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,500 5,437 836 69 33 46 112
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,357 5,332 797 72 35 52 104
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,170 5,191 746 71 36 54 108
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,177 5,237 717 71 37 49 103
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,246 5,320 709 71 39 51 95
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,204 5,336 635 71 35 61 101
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,183 5,368 595 67 35 64 89
2008 Manual count 6,058 5,252 586 73 35 57 90
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,067 11,889 1,660 260 38 67 191
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,220 12,083 1,577 279 61 71 210
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,468 12,317 1,554 290 39 81 226
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 14,979 12,911 1,457 271 46 100 240
2003 Manual count 14,733 12,745 1,324 221 57 151 292
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,577 13,461 1,426 239 26 148 303
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 15,274 13,249 1,330 251 25 143 301
2000 Manual count 15,680 13,673 1,320 263 26 136 288

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 27433 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 27433 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 96

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.