Skip to main content

26567

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region North West
Local authority Warrington
Road name A56
Road type Major
Start junction road Oughtrington Lane, Lymm
End junction road LA Boundary
Link length 2.10km (1.30 miles)
Easting & Northing 369450,386350
Latitude & longitude 53.37314,-2.46064

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,660 5,395 948 183 15 67 68
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,613 5,401 896 177 15 69 70
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,476 5,335 829 172 15 69 71
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,483 5,399 775 168 15 72 69
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,348 5,324 721 166 19 70 68
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,404 5,424 671 165 19 69 74
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,533 5,581 640 162 20 75 75
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 6,470 5,565 605 159 23 69 72
2009 Manual count 6,560 5,672 588 152 23 78 70
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,533 6,349 742 289 21 90 63
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,783 6,593 742 301 21 90 57
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,856 6,769 672 272 21 90 53
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,657 6,585 641 266 23 108 57
2004 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,646 6,592 610 270 21 117 57
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,626 6,585 605 258 21 113 65
2002 Manual count 7,477 6,526 537 259 26 92 63
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,193 6,391 537 119 19 58 88
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 7,154 6,372 519 121 22 52 90

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 26567 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 26567 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 48

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.