Skip to main content

26007

Details

AADF latest year 2024
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Leeds
Road name M1
Road type Major
Start junction road 41
End junction road 42
Link length 2.30km (1.43 miles)
Easting & Northing 431500,425120
Latitude & longitude 53.72156,-1.52412

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2024 Manual count 135,571 95,753 26,513 12,772 0 226 307
2023 Manual count 133,833 93,687 25,758 13,895 0 189 305
2022 Manual count 138,739 100,429 24,953 12,970 0 221 166
2021 Manual count 131,913 91,327 25,609 14,650 0 201 127
2020 Manual count 126,607 89,183 24,767 12,536 0 68 53
2019 Manual count 141,474 105,983 21,646 13,299 0 269 277
2018 Manual count 135,503 100,824 21,117 12,916 0 247 398
2017 Manual count 140,271 105,697 22,568 11,439 0 330 237
2016 Manual count 129,032 95,518 21,413 11,463 0 396 242
2015 Manual count 117,748 88,931 17,989 10,366 0 187 275
2014 Manual count 111,006 83,786 15,715 10,937 0 256 312
2013 Manual count 104,171 78,298 16,353 8,874 0 360 285
2012 Manual count 110,642 84,107 17,136 8,803 0 344 252
2011 Manual count 119,610 90,992 16,238 11,553 0 383 444
2010 Manual count 112,231 85,164 16,899 9,462 0 354 352
2009 Manual count 114,842 88,914 15,434 9,733 0 368 393
2008 Manual count 130,818 101,117 18,063 10,842 0 346 450
2007 Manual count 128,965 96,037 19,324 12,840 0 325 439
2006 Manual count 125,785 95,249 17,479 11,995 0 384 678
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 124,359 92,397 18,074 12,849 0 430 609
2004 Manual count 123,947 92,397 17,462 13,076 0 426 586
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 111,467 84,101 14,332 12,213 0 382 439
2002 Manual count 113,663 86,169 13,915 12,814 0 338 427
2001 Manual count 117,991 90,243 15,083 12,323 0 22 320
2000 Manual count 117,452 90,282 14,773 11,696 0 251 450

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 26007 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 26007 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 25
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 50
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 552

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.