Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

17883

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Calderdale
Road name A629
Road type Major
Start junction road LA Boundary
End junction road A6025
Link length 3.10km (1.93 miles)
Easting & Northing 411457,419506
Latitude & longitude 53.67192,-1.82806

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Manual count 27,156 21,650 3,614 1,560 35 163 169
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 23,240 18,648 3,305 948 16 182 157
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,694 18,361 3,026 951 18 186 169
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,895 18,704 2,877 960 19 183 171
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,655 18,900 2,526 895 20 172 161
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 22,747 19,008 2,498 898 20 172 171
2011 Manual count 23,017 19,089 2,601 977 21 191 159
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 29,528 24,442 3,605 1,127 45 133 221
2009 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 30,084 24,966 3,587 1,176 45 145 210
2008 Manual count 30,279 25,372 3,312 1,227 45 154 214
2007 Manual count 30,340 25,227 3,477 1,128 21 230 278
2006 Manual count 25,755 21,052 3,126 1,228 14 193 156
2005 Manual count 26,928 22,257 3,269 1,130 14 194 78
2004 Manual count 27,062 22,139 3,450 1,230 23 154 89
2003 Manual count 27,838 23,103 3,132 1,299 36 208 96
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 26,301 21,589 3,184 1,202 27 175 151
2001 Manual count 26,368 21,632 3,178 1,237 26 173 148
2000 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 26,742 22,238 3,081 1,085 15 186 152

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 17883 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 17883 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 216

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.