Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

17450

Details

AADF latest year 2017
Region East of England
Local authority Norfolk
Road name A1067
Road type Major
Start junction road B1145W
End junction road B1145 E Bawdeswell
Link length 1.00km (0.62 miles)
Easting & Northing 604781,320399
Latitude & longitude 52.74244,1.03225

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2017 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,531 6,620 2,361 444 0 64 42
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,400 6,628 2,231 432 0 66 43
2015 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,140 6,546 2,066 417 0 66 44
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,995 6,592 1,898 396 0 66 43
2013 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,933 6,609 1,823 399 0 60 42
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,890 6,624 1,761 404 0 58 42
2011 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,894 6,677 1,703 410 0 63 41
2010 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 8,898 6,718 1,658 425 0 58 39
2009 Manual count 8,947 6,814 1,608 424 0 64 37
2008 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,040 7,526 1,823 548 3 87 56
2007 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,215 7,775 1,756 549 3 83 52
2006 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,905 7,713 1,550 513 3 81 48
2005 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,786 7,713 1,443 505 3 81 44
2004 Manual count 9,709 7,667 1,394 511 3 93 44
2003 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,482 8,232 1,312 730 7 126 82
2002 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 10,223 8,126 1,170 720 9 116 91
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 9,962 7,959 1,116 696 9 113 78
2000 Manual count 9,615 7,631 1,102 700 10 110 72

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 17450 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 17450 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 18
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 36
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 72

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.