Skip to main content
Road traffic statistics

16593

Details

AADF latest year 2019
Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Leeds
Road name A64
Road type Major
Start junction road A64(M)
End junction road A63
Link length 2.80km (1.74 miles)
Easting & Northing 433000,434000
Latitude & longitude 53.80128,-1.50045

Location

Contents

Average Annual Daily Flow

Average annual daily flow
Year Count method All motor vehicles Cars & taxis LGVs HGVs Pedal cycles Motorcycles Buses & coaches
2019 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 40,934 34,103 5,077 589 247 275 890
2018 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 40,565 33,681 5,122 588 225 293 880
2017 Manual count 40,935 34,056 5,028 584 204 296 971
2016 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 46,323 39,033 5,278 766 197 286 960
2015 Manual count 45,349 38,434 4,832 755 211 292 1,036
2014 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 42,441 34,078 6,152 514 118 296 1,401
2013 Manual count 41,913 34,435 5,403 477 122 278 1,320
2012 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 41,198 34,341 4,985 564 177 281 1,028
2011 Manual count 41,569 34,487 5,191 623 187 311 957
2010 Manual count 42,921 35,428 5,351 706 182 443 993
2009 Manual count 43,568 35,680 5,555 786 252 342 1,205
2008 Manual count 46,234 37,407 6,178 1,086 148 434 1,129
2007 Manual count 47,176 38,849 5,825 935 119 315 1,252
2006 Manual count 46,967 38,355 5,867 863 132 433 1,449
2005 Manual count 45,958 37,811 5,497 956 107 407 1,287
2004 Manual count 44,853 36,757 5,348 910 116 434 1,404
2003 Manual count 43,788 36,106 4,899 958 223 532 1,293
2002 Manual count 43,024 35,953 4,438 1,073 92 397 1,163
2001 Estimated using AADF from previous year on this link 46,664 39,134 4,397 1,205 105 697 1,231
2000 Manual count 45,879 38,367 4,414 1,217 110 673 1,208

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as accredited official statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Site details
Manual count point site 16593 details
Average annual daily flow
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year.
Average annual daily flow by direction
Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel.
Raw counts
Vehicle counts recorded at this count point.
Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 16593 details 1
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 20
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 40
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 336

To apply more filters to downloads, or retrieve data split into pages you can use our API.