Manual count points

Site number: 6054

Site details

Region Yorkshire and The Humber
Local authority Calderdale
Road name M62
Road classification Motorway
Managed by Highways England
Road type Major
Start junction 22
End junction LA Boundary
Link length 6.00km (3.73 miles)
Easting, northing 404000, 416600
Latitude, longitude 53.64589300, -1.94096650

Location

Annual Average daily flow

Year Count method Pedal cycles Two wheeled motor vehicles Cars and taxis Buses and coaches Light goods vehicles Heavy goods vehicles All motor vehicles
2023 Estimated using previous year's AADF on this link 0 136 71956 146 20206 18353 110797
2022 Automatic counter 0 132 62119 161 22459 17950 102822
2021 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 0 115 53789 138 19373 17377 90792
2020 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 0 54 46034 54 15976 18176 80295
2019 Automatic counter 0 152 73632 185 19180 18476 111625
2018 Automatic counter 0 146 67418 171 17831 17094 102660
2017 Automatic counter 0 147 68196 171 17335 16918 102767
2016 Dependent on a neighbouring counted link 0 163 70404 180 16482 16807 104036
2015 Estimated using previous year's AADF on this link 0 160 70762 203 15269 17178 103573
2014 Manual count 0 164 70575 219 13722 16600 101281
2013 Manual count 0 149 58407 225 13643 14818 87242
2012 Manual count 0 159 62339 205 13427 14657 90787
2011 Manual count 0 187 64468 212 14964 16429 96260
2010 Manual count 0 148 61654 155 12948 15408 90313
2009 Manual count 0 295 68229 238 13352 14412 96526
2008 Manual count 0 202 63611 426 14084 15265 93588
2007 Manual count 0 234 63999 277 12485 17053 94048
2006 Manual count 0 157 61446 305 14541 14728 91177
2005 Manual count 0 155 61152 244 12352 16376 90279
2004 Manual count 0 145 60210 227 12451 18038 91071
2003 Manual count 0 128 65358 222 12505 17391 95604
2002 Manual count 0 186 60729 293 12031 15214 88453
2001 Manual count 0 158 61925 315 11011 16223 89632
2000 Manual count 0 130 58960 319 11241 15109 85759

Download data

Data disclaimer

Traffic figures at the regional and national level are robust, and are reported as National Statistics. However, DfT’s traffic estimates for individual road links and small areas are less robust, as they are not always based on up-to-date counts made at these locations. Where other more up-to-date sources of traffic data are available (e.g. from local highways authorities), this may provide a more accurate estimate of traffic at these locations.

It is the responsibility of the user to decide which data are most appropriate for their purpose, and if DfT road link level traffic estimates are used, to make a note of the limitations in any published material.

Quality flags in data downloads

DfT’s road link level traffic estimates are calculated using a variety of methods, with some methods likely to produce more accurate estimates than others.

The data tables available to download here contain a column - estimation_method – showing the method used to estimate traffic for each location and year. Figures having an estimation method of “Counted” are likely to be more accurate than those marked as “Estimated”, and the latter should be used with caution.

Data Description Records Download
Site details Manual count point site 6054 details. 1 JSON | CSV
Average annual daily flow Number of vehicles that travel past the count point (in both directions) on an average day of the year. 24 JSON | CSV
Average annual daily flow by direction Number of vehicles that travel past the count point on an average day of the year, by direction of travel. 48 JSON | CSV
Raw counts Vehicle counts recorded at this count point. 360 JSON | CSV